China’s Response to Criticism
China responded to criticism of Hong Kong’s new national security law by Western powers and the United Nations, defending the law as essential for security and prosperity.
British and Australian Concerns
British Foreign Secretary David Cameron and Australia’s top diplomat Penny Wong expressed concerns over the rushed process and potential impact on rights and freedoms in Hong Kong.
International Opposition
The United States, UN, European Union, and Japan have also voiced opposition to the law, citing concerns about its impact on freedoms and autonomy in the city.
China’s Defense of the Law
Chinese officials defended the law as necessary for security and development, criticizing Western criticism as unfounded attacks.
UK and EU Reactions
China criticized the UK and EU for their positions on the law, accusing them of hypocrisy and interference in internal affairs.
Impact on Hong Kong
The new law aims to address gaps in existing legislation and strengthen security measures in Hong Kong, following the 2019 democracy protests.
International Concerns
International bodies and countries have expressed grave concerns about the impact of the law on human rights, freedoms, and the “one country, two systems” framework.
US and UN Statements
The US State Department and UN high commissioner for human rights criticized the law for its vague provisions and regressive impact on human rights protection.
EU and Japan’s Stance
The EU raised concerns about the law’s impact on the city’s freedoms and long-term attractiveness as an international business hub, while Japan emphasized the importance of upholding a free and open system in Hong Kong.
